<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review &#8211; 2008 Subaru Impreza Outback Sport</title>
	<atom:link href="http://collegecars.wordpress.com/2008/06/04/review-2008-subaru-impreza-outback-sport/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://collegecars.wordpress.com/2008/06/04/review-2008-subaru-impreza-outback-sport/</link>
	<description>Car reviews, news, information, spy photos, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:32:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Review &#8211; 2009 Subaru Impreza 2.5i Premium &#171; College Cars Online</title>
		<link>http://collegecars.wordpress.com/2008/06/04/review-2008-subaru-impreza-outback-sport/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Review &#8211; 2009 Subaru Impreza 2.5i Premium &#171; College Cars Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegecars.wordpress.com/?p=10#comment-143</guid>
		<description>[...] For those of you who read the site regularly, this car might seem rather familiar. The Impreza Premium, as tested in five-door form, is nearly identical to the Outback Sport we reviewed last June. This shorter review, as a result, will mostly focus on the differences between the cars; for a more complete summary, please check out our Outback Sport post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For those of you who read the site regularly, this car might seem rather familiar. The Impreza Premium, as tested in five-door form, is nearly identical to the Outback Sport we reviewed last June. This shorter review, as a result, will mostly focus on the differences between the cars; for a more complete summary, please check out our Outback Sport post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://collegecars.wordpress.com/2008/06/04/review-2008-subaru-impreza-outback-sport/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegecars.wordpress.com/?p=10#comment-90</guid>
		<description>I have one of these and I absolutely love it, aside from the gas mileage at times (only because of a lead foot) and the roof rack wind noise (easily remedied by removing). The car has more than enough pickup for merging onto freeways and it has been great the three or four times I have gotten to use it in the snow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have one of these and I absolutely love it, aside from the gas mileage at times (only because of a lead foot) and the roof rack wind noise (easily remedied by removing). The car has more than enough pickup for merging onto freeways and it has been great the three or four times I have gotten to use it in the snow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
